Laws against banks with ties to Epstein may be subject to new scrutiny in financial crimes Jeffrey Epstein

Over the years, survivors of the Jeffrey Epstein they want justice. For a while, it looked like it could be found.

Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's ex-girlfriend, she was found guilty sexual distractions four years ago to take on a relationship problem with teenage girls – and they will be judged Imprisoned for 20 years.

Meanwhile, the banks that did business with Epstein, even without admitting the wrongdoing, will be paid Hundreds of thousands in the villages of the affected people. Donald Trump even released the Epterin files as part of his campaign platform, and he backed off on his promise to do so earlier this year.

In the end, Trump's Justice Department did not release these files, and their arrangements were included in the family reports between him and Epstein. Promises to release the files have been put to rest, due to the increased political and judicial bias.

But two new cases that can raise the Epterin products among the dangers – even if it is about their problems.

These charges, made by an anonymous American critic and the bank of New York Mellon (Bny), Hallege that these economic forces do not support Epteri's sexuality. Suits by Sugrid S McCawley, Schiller Flexner, and Chad Edward Henderson, former victims.

“Eptein carried out these crimes not only using his wealth and power, but also through financial support and organizations, including Bny. “Unfaithfully, Bny had a lot to do with Eptein's story but chose to protect the victims.”

Bank of America's suit details these claims, saying it is a financial aid to and cooperation with Epstein's legal entities and carriers to conduct illegal business activities. The suit said Bank of America was left to make suspicious reports.

Long-time officials who speak with conservationists said proving that would be difficult. But he also recognized the potential consequences of silencing his critics or disclosing details of earlier requests.

Neama Rahmani, a former West Coast protester, said the evidence shows that the actions of the weapons lead to destruction.

“I don't think the cases have a chance of success – and obviously I'm on the side of the victims, and I want them to answer with justice and revenge,” Rahomani said. Some may be more subtle.

“Everything comes down to evidence,” Rahomani said. The lawyer must prove the crime, which means “but for the defendant, the injury would not have occurred”. At this time, this would have ended “but for the banking system, the victim would not have been sold”, Rahoni explained.

The prosecutor can also go beyond the “but standard”. “It's not 'but' waste. It must also be something serious: that's every mistake, if there was something serious in causing the problem.

“By dating Epstein, is that helpful? I don't know.”

On the other hand, cases like these can make organizations realize that a relationship with a wrongdoer can have a wrongful liability on their part.

He said: “It's interesting. If the banks try to make this possible and fail, Rahmani hopes to implement it quickly. “No one wants to travel related to Eptein.”

Eric FADDIS, a trial lawyer and founder of the Colorado law firm Rurner Fashrdar and a former plaintiff, said that companies can be held responsible. At this time, “whether the banks have a problem that goes to Hinge, in part, if they have any information to abuse Eptein.

“But even then, I think it will be difficult to turn the beaches into some kind of immorality. Banks can't be secretive about the details of the claims,” ​​Fashdis said. Despite Florin's passion for people, “It is not acceptable in a bank to have a useless customer”.

“It would not be allowed for one bank to be the most difficult for the customer, but the two problems are very different, so I think it will be difficult for the coasts.”

This means that the most important aspects of abuse can help epstein survivors.

“These cases can explain a lot of the Epstein Saga,” Fashdis said. “While there have always been walls of access for people to want this, when there are cases, there are ways to get it, and those ways to get it require disclosure of what was not in the public domain.”

Edwards said that the suit would have the power to accomplish what lawmakers have failed to do.

“Laws are necessary to achieve justice Jeffrey Epstein – And future events that will also trouble the institutions that have this problem – if our financial institutions are not accounted for every important part that this takes place, either by giving approvals for everyone to do or putting a financial part for this and put.

He said: “We have a better chance of making a real difference than Congress, because we know the truth and political history but by protecting survivors, who have abused survivors, who have been abused in the past.

“We approach these matters without following any political bias and will not prevent the closure of SWDWown, protect wealthy politicians, or other embattled politicians.”

McCawley said in a statement: “As Congress is being chased by how Jeffrey Epsterin ended their criminal enterprise for years without recognition, we are taking another step forward in judging survivors.”

When asked or responded to the charges, Bny said: “These false claims are good, and we will defend them vigorously.”

Bank of America similarly said: “We are defending ourselves vigorously on this matter.”